Example: An IT provider with 12 PCs. Wolfeye shows live who is working when – and where time is lost.
Many business owners have the feeling: “We are always busy – but still falling behind.”
This example shows how an IT owner with 12 PCs used live screen data to make time-wasters visible and
roughly reclaim about 15 hours per week in productive time.
The numbers are a model calculation – they are not a scientific study, but an illustration of what hidden distractions might look like in hours and costs.
Important: How you implement monitoring legally (information, consent, works council, etc.) depends on the laws in your country.
Foto: Pexels (CC0) – symbolisches Beispiel für Produktivitätsverlust
In many companies, a relevant portion of working time is lost to activities that are not directly related to the actual job – like videos, social media or private browsing. Excel sheets, ticket systems or meetings only show this indirectly. Live screen visibility can help make loss of focus tangible instead of relying purely on gut feeling.
Wolfeye runs in the background and sends the current screen in short intervals to a central dashboard – so you can view multiple PCs at once.
By default, only the latest screenshot is kept on the server; each new image overwrites the previous one.
A permanent screenshot history exists only if you deliberately enable the history feature.
Important: Whether and how you must inform employees about monitoring or obtain their consent depends on
local labour and data protection laws in your jurisdiction (e.g., works council, internal agreements, consent).
We do not provide legal advice – you should consult a lawyer if in doubt.
Let’s take a simplified example scenario: an IT provider with 12 PCs looks at a few days of live screen data to understand when people are truly focused – and when they are frequently switching context.
From this, we build a model calculation for a typical week with 12 PCs.
The figures below are not a scientific study, but an illustrative calculation to show how common distractions might translate into hours and costs.
| Platform / Activity | Time/Week (estimated) | Cost/Month (estimated) |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube / entertainment | 48 hours | approx. $1,200 |
| Social media | 32 hours | approx. $800 |
| Private emails / browsing | 20 hours | approx. $500 |
Before (example): Many short interruptions, parallel browsing, no clear focus block.
After (example): Introduction of daily focus blocks (e.g., 9–11 am) where private pages are not supposed to be open.
In this model, result: significantly less distraction and roughly 15 hrs/week more productive time.
Many companies manage productivity mostly based on feelings, tickets or time sheets. Continuous screen data can help you additionally understand
Foto: Pexels (CC0) – symbolisches Beispiel für Live-Monitoring
This 12-PC scenario and the 15 hrs/week figure are a model calculation.
It illustrates how live screen data can help you uncover hidden time-wasters and then make better decisions –
such as introducing focus blocks or adjusting workflows.
How you use monitoring must always fit your team, your culture and the legal framework in your jurisdiction.
Wolfeye provides the technical capabilities – the legal setup should be reviewed with a qualified attorney.